POINTS OF CONTACT WITH THE
CHRISTIAN ANTI-TRADITIONALIST LEFT, AND IN
PARTICULAR, EVANGELICAL
INQUIRERS
© 2002 by Orchid Land Publications
Evangelicals on the anti-traditionalist left of Christianity no longer reject Crosses, pictures, and vestments (at least secular-academic gowns, choir robes) as idolatrous. But many of them do reject doctrines and confuse conversion (which is sometimes instantaneous) with Salvation. Emotion has largely replaced fixed belief, as the reports on born-again Christians (mostly Evangelicals) by the Barna Organization show. Luther's fiducia "confidence, trust" has greatly replaced fides "belief." But the chief gulf between Evangelicals and traditional Eastern Christianity lies in their views of the role of creation--matter and time--in religion:
| Axiomatic paradigms (where "form" is interpretive) | ||
| Hebrews | Eastern Christianity | Evangelicalism |
| MATTER: creatures of- fered to God to acknowl- edge His ownership and dominion over all FORM: Juridical (legalistic atone- ment, etc.) |
MATTER: Material Mysteries (Sacra- ment[al]s) play vital rôles in Salvation (théosis) FORM: Energy ontology, as in the New Testament |
MATTER: Gnostic anti- rôle of matter FORM: Jurid- ical (legalistic atonement, etc.) |
The communication gulf cannot be easily overcome; but we can begin:
--Bible:
Show what the Greek means by the energy words, Logos, 'omoiosis [to be explained
as uncreated Energy in Gen. 1:26; cf. the "waves" present before water
or anything else was created]; that Jesus is YHWH (in John 8:58, he
ascribes Exod. 3:14 to Himself; cf. the Semitic words behind Luke 1:43).
YOU NEED TO KNOW THE BIBLE--in Greek, if possible!
--The non-static (developmental) view of reality when Energy is a basic concept
of reality--e.g. tradition is revelatory (doctrines evolve; but dogma/truth
doesn't).
The old arguments of tradition's existence before the Bible, it's codification
by the Orthodox Church in the latter fourth century, etc. remain valid.
But get the Biblical verses against individualist interpretations--2 Pet. 1:20 and
Col. 2:23 (against ethelothresk(e)ía "self-invented
Worship/piety"). But all of that means nothing if you cannot get
across the idea that creation plays a rôle in Worship and Salvation, that
created matter and time are not evil or irrelevant, that Jesus emphasized the rôle of water (John 3) and bread and wine
(John 6), and--ABOVE ALL--that
Jesus became flesh and rose bodily--so that the flesh of His worshipers may
rise again. The centrality of material Resurrection in the New Testament
has got to be the main talking point. Arm yourself with relevant Bible
passages. For Salvation, get the real Greek (e.g. the Orthodox
New Testament) of Philp. 2:13 and 2 Pet. l:20. The energy passages are
discussed HERE.
Don't forget, the non-Catholics have a new world view invented in
the late Middle Ages. The tremendous gulf between today in the West and the Greek
culture of the Eastern Mediterranean has got to be gotten across, or nothing
else can be achieved. Crossing that gulf cannot be easy. You cannot
argue from our assumptions--or let them argue against us from their assumptions.
Where creation, revelation, and Salvation are instantaneous-timeless for
Protestants, they are energetic and on-going for the Orthodox. Though
Christ's Immolation cannot be repeated (it was once-for-all--ephapax),
the offering up (sacrifice) of it can be repeated, as in His worshipers He
offers His Body and Blood up at every Eucharistic Sacrifice. This is true
Worship--what is offered to God--not sermons directed to people.

SITE UNDER CONSTRUCTION